Mario Salieri Free Vids

bargaining March 4

The meeting for the bargaining is scheduled for March 4 at 11:00 am
pv
AGENDA



Information - Presentation of the Code of Ethics
- Discussion on the planning of university education
- Renewal Committee is social work interventions (expired on 31 / 12/08)
- Any other

Were To Buy A Shadow Pikachu In Canada

Internal Mobility Rules: You could take a step forward if they have made two back

the trading session on 16 February 2009 they arrived to vote on the agreement of bargaining on the general criteria for office furniture made by the administration and demand for mobility.

The comparison was based on a draft regulation by the administration that, in the opinion of RDB, is worse than the national agreement and in some ways also the former University Regulations.

jurisprudential spirit has always been recognized as the "seat" the physical place of work. In our case, the Administration has wanted to make clear that home is deemed to be "understood as the organizational structure of the University Area Center, Department" to this first statement already apriva una voragine di discrezionalità alla parte pubblica permettendo ad esempio ad un dipendente di essere spostato dalla Biblioteca di Storia a quella di Farmacia senza alcuna tutela e senza necessitare di alcuna motivazione, si è aggiunta nella seduta di lunedì questa frase "Le parti intendono come diversa sede anche quella all'interno dell 'Area, nel caso di mobilità tra settori che si configurano con attività non affini".

Questa frase sembrerebbe porre vincoli alla parte pubblica mentre ad un esame più attento si rivela del tutto priva di significato pratico. Non è in alcun modo chiarita la nozione di "Attività affine" per cui potremo avere spostamenti di dipendenti non considerati come trasferimenti e quindi svincolati from any protection, only on the basis of a review of similar activity is not contestable and incontestable.

In what concerns the mobility have been added at the request of the statements and everything superfluous is without prejudice to the possibility of the Administration to distribute tasks, in fact, at its sole discretion. At this point the Administration has rejected our proposal to reproduce exactly as provided by the National Agreement which provides that every place that becomes available for dissolution, transfer of personnel or organization of new offices is subjected to selection.

Experience transfer office tempted by the Administration a few months ago and then withdrawn because contrary to the provisions of the contract would recommend to everyone more attention. Unfortunately

The public has not always proven to be up to its task of protecting the assets of its employees including, but rather has expanded dramatically its discretion to make decisions that are clearly punitive. The new agreement allows, in fact, the Administration, to continue along the same road.

E 'obvious risk of opening new disputes between employees and the Administration on all matters of internal mobility, with a real risk of crippling even the interventions necessary to improve the overall effectiveness of the university and the development of staff.

is therefore inconsistent, in our opinion, the decision to other union representatives to sign an agreement that essentially has not accepted any of the requests made by the trade unions themselves, but merely reiterated the administration's position by changing only in form and never the substance of the content of the Agreement.

RDBs, having demonstrated a greater willingness to search for a compromise beneficial to all, have therefore decided not to sign the above text, in any form and will continue to protect workers.

Trade Unions of Base (RDB-CUB)

Milena Velba This Aint

Invito

The current economic crisis and its causes challenge all organizations involved in the area and individual citizens.

So not only for its possible effects on social cohesion of the country but also the risk of creating or reinforcing the already widespread feeling of helplessness and lack of interest in the collective destiny of the country.

In this context there is a strong concern about the problems and the growth of southern Italy on which the Churches of the South have found it necessary to question (Conference in Naples on February 12 and 13) at 20 years by the Italian Bishops' Conference document on " Church and Italian Mezzogiorno " significantly when it was launched a strong challenge: "The country will not grow if not together."

And in this sense an important contribution to reflection and commitment is the recent publication of Puglia economist Prof. Gianfranco Viesti on "treason to the South. The North, South and the policy that does not exist "(Editori Laterza).

E 'is quite evident as policy, now more than ever, is urged in its task of reading the social and economic phenomena to discover the function of "government" that can never be identified in a straightforward representation and management of the amount of interest details. The coalition

I support the candidate for Mayor (Democrats for the Constitution, PRC, PDCI, Democratic Left and Italy of Values), by virtue of a shared determination to build a new center, aims to promote an open debate, and then comparing rich and productive for the future of the city.

The challenge is huge. But we can not allow that in the face of the serious and dramatic problems that have embarrassed reiterate old logic of human skills and financial resources plundered with devastating results for the area.

For these reasons, I would first invite to a public debate to be held Saturday, February 21, 2009 at 18:30 at the Imperial Theatre (via Hall).

The theme of the comparison would be: "Work, Business, insecurity: how to protect themselves from the crisis. Assumption of a commitment to the territory. "

will help us in this first consideration of the President of Confindustria Brindisi, Massimo Ferrarese, and the Secretary General of the CGIL, Leo Caroli.

Trusting in His presence I thank you in advance for your kind attention and for the valuable and welcome collaboration.


Francavilla Fontana, 14.02.2009
Mr. Filomeno Mario

Resetting Lotus Baggage Lock

Esposto sulla discarica

Francavilla Fontana, there 31.01.2009
Preg.mo Commissioner Prefectural municipality of Francavilla Fontana


Preg.mo President ATO BR / 2 Mayor Cosimo FERRETTI - ORIA




Preg.mo Mr President of the Province of BRINDISI




Preg.mo Mr PRESIDENT Regional Pugliese - BARI




Preg.mo Councillor for the Environment Mr Puglia - BARI




Preg.mo Prefect of Brindisi




to Mr. Prosecutor at the Court of BRINDISI




to Mr. Prosecutor at the Court of BARI





and pc to the media

Subject: Presentations on "first-class sanitary landfill located in Francavilla Fontana in the Via San Vito.
Act grant for the construction and management to the company FRANCAVILLA ENVIRONMENT plant selection and bio-stabilization and eventual implementation of landfill service / rescue ever in the territory of Francavilla Fontana (BR). Investigations about the regularity and legality for procedural system "complex". CHECK Convention and landfill management service.

The undersigned: Mr. Mario PHILOMENA (former city councilor Francavilla Fontana), Emanuele MODUGNO (Former city councilor and co-secretaries of the local PRC), Angelo Roche (Secretary of the local PDCI), Eugenio DE SIMONE (coordinator of the Democratic Left), Vittorio MISTRESS (Commissioner of the local club "Italy of Values") and Carlo Altavilla (coordinator of the Movement "Democrats for the Constitution), all residing in the Francavilla F.na via Salvo d'Acquisto No 25 (Mr. Mario Filomeno study - for communications: tel. 0831/844925 - cell. 368/3952851 - e-mail address mario.filomeno @ libero.it)
WHEREAS

-these days they are aware of a tender care from the company Francavilla Environment Consortium Limited (based in Capurso - BA Provincial Road Trigg Carbonara - 0.600 km - REA No. 439702) as first-class operator of the landfill located in Francavilla Fontana. Once that contract award the work to implement a system of selection and biostabilisation;

-time occurs during the management of the Municipality of Francavilla Commissarial F.na;

-Francavilla F.na City Council, before the winding-up provisions for the resignation of Dr. Mayor. Joseph Marinotti, at its meeting on 14.03.2008 had approved unanimously on an agenda with which he urged the calling of a conference dei servizi con l’intervento delle Autorità competenti (ATO BR/1, ATO BR/2, Provincia di Brindisi e Regione Puglia) al fine di predisporre ogni opportuno iter volto alla esclusione del territorio di Francavilla Fontana da ulteriori insediamenti di discariche o impianti per il trattamento di R.S.U. impegnando nel contempo gli Organi competenti ad individuare,quale sede dell’impianto di selezione e di biostabilizzazione, quella in adiacenza o prossimità di discarica di servizio/soccorso da avviare ex novo in territorio esterno al Comune di Francavilla;

-tale decisione veniva adottata a seguito della mozione presentata dal sottoscritto Avv. Mario Filomeno in data 28.09.2007, discussa nelle sedute consiliari del 15.10.2007 e 12.11.2007 and rejected by the majority, and as a result of successive calls came from a committee of citizens;
-
was also resolved that the assumption on the basis of statements by the President of the ATO BR / 2 dr. Cosimo Ferretti, always made at its meeting on 14.03.2008, which did not exclude the hypothesis of identification of another site outside the territory of Francavilla for the construction of the landfill service / rescue and connected systems such as bio-stabilization;

-to this point remain intact, and then abbisognevoli strict, be postponed and urgent investigations (these days seems to be in the process of defining the invitation to tender for the work to implement dell’impianto di biostabilizzazione),sia in sede amministrativa sia in sede giudiziaria, tutti i rilievi e le censure mosse in ordine all’iter promosso e perfezionato a suo tempo dalla Regione Puglia e definitosi con l’aggiudicazione in favore della Francavilla Ambiente della realizzazione dell’impianto di selezione e biostabilizzazione.

Il tutto,parrebbe, sul presupposto della gestione in atto,sempre nel territorio di Francavilla, di una discarica di servizio/soccorso mentre trattasi di discarica di rifiuti “tal quali”.

All’uopo si richiama il contenuto integrale della menzionata mozione che si allega al presente esposto e comunque già trasmesso nel settembre/ottobre 2007 alle Administrative and political authorities in address;

-the motion was not approved, it should be noted, as the majority did not think to share the decision to assign duties to two experts in order to revisit all the formal procedures that he had entrusted to Francavilla Environment as manager of the landfill of waste "as such, implementation and management of the complex with its landfill service / rescue;

-in about some members of the majority pointed out (see minutes of the meetings mentioned: 10.15.2007 and 12.11. 2007) so that was not possible to arrive already having a previous legal opinion regarding the award of construction plant bio-stabilization (see letter dated 03/19/2007 and received at the Municipal Archives on 20.03.2007 - prot. No 10022 of 03/21/2007).

on these events will draw Giuntali resolutions nos. 92 of 282 of 13.10.2006 and 30.03.2007 and by the determination of the Head of Litigation No 319 of 12.24.2007 (No 1748 of 31.12.2007 index).

It should be emphasized at least as to the attorney in question had apparently not been given the task as called for in the meeting held on 11.12.2007, namely the one concerning the verification of the legality of acts of expectations arising from the Region of Puglia.

CIRCUMSTANCES THAT

Francavilla, the Environment, based on the investigations carried out by the Head of the Technical and subsequent review by the police headquarters, was liable for gross negligence and omissions in respect of the management of the landfill of waste, it insists, "this such as ". A much

achieve their complaints and sanctions, as required by the agreement signed on 07.12.2000 between the City of Francavilla F. and the original consortium (Lombardi Ecology Ltd, Thermomechanical EMAS Environment and spa spa).

As a result of repeated irregularities found by July 4, 2006 to 8/22/2006, were sanctioned a total di € 70.582,32=.

Come si legge nella delibera n. 384 del 19.12.2006, La Giunta pro-tempore riteneva di aderire alla richiesta avanzata dalla Francavilla Ambiente di attivazione di un Collegio arbitrale onde comporre la vertenza nominando nel contempo il proprio componente in tale Collegio.

Da quel momento ed almeno sino allo scioglimento del Consiglio Comunale,per ragioni che sfuggono, la vicenda non risulta essere stata definita;

-inoltre il legale rappresentante della Francavilla Ambiente,unitamente al legale rappresentante della ditta MONTECO s.r.l. che gestisce nel Comune di Francavilla l’appalto per la raccolta dei rifiuti solidi urbani, risulta sottoposto a procedimento penale c/o il Tribunale di Brindisi (Proc. R. No 8206/07 mod. 21) for making the collection, trafficking, transporting and disposing of hazardous or special waste without the required authorization.

fact on 10.11.2007 ensure that operators of GdF at the landfill via San Vito, authorized only for municipal solid waste, half of the company was conducting Monteco the discharge of waste classified as dangerous.

With Decision No. 07.02.2008 43 of the Town Council of Francavilla decided to bring a civil claim as a result of recording evidence served on 1/23/2008;

-last, as reported by local press, in civil proceedings brought by way of urgent from a small town, the owner of a property adjoining the existing landfill, the CTU mandated by the court because the owner, Dr. Invitto Council (Court of Lecce - proc. No 5105/07), has found more serious deficiencies put in place from Francavilla Environment.

fact, and as detected here, it was found that the mode of operation of the facility are not in accordance with the provisions of the Convention, 13/01/2003 by Legislative Decree and its appendices, as provided by technology.

was also found not to contain an assessment of the impact caused by fugitive emissions and at the same time there are no danger levels for leaks or biogas riscontrata la presenza di un piano di intervento.

Su tale scorta il Giudice,in data 27.10.08, ha emesso un provvedimento cautelare a tutela delle ragioni fatte valere ordinando alla Francavilla Ambiente a porre in essere con “immediatezza” una serie di interventi organizzativi volti a contrastare fenomeni di immissioni diffuse e fughe di gas (copertura giornaliera sistematica dei rifiuti, esauriente ed approfondita “analisi di valutazione dei rischi” onde predisporre interventi correttivi..).

TUTTO CIO’ PREMESSO E CONSIDERATO

risultati vani tutti i tentativi posti in essere sia sul piano politico sia sul piano amministrativo (raccolta di firme, mozione, Ordini del giorno) e trattandosi non di mere dispute politico-amministrative, si chiede che le Autorità in indirizzo,ciascuno per quanto di competenza e previa acquisizione di ogni opportuna informativa e documentazione di cui alla mozione ed ai fatti innanzi esposti, procedano nei rigorosi accertamenti invocati al fine di assicurare il controllo di legittimità e di legalità sia dell’iter procedurale che ha determinato l’affidamento a suo tempo della realizzazione e gestione dell’impianto “complesso” sia la gestione della discarica di rifiuti “tal quali” con ogni conseguente ed opportuno provvedimento.

Tanto a tutela e garanzia della sicurezza e dei diritti costituzionalmente riconosciuti in favore dei singoli cittadini e all’intera local community.

Some kind of attention, Best regards. Mr. Mario

PHILOMENA

Emanuele MODUGNO

Angelo Eugene Roche

DE SIMONE

Vittorio MADAMA

Carlo ALTAVILLA